Legal Opinion
Parliman v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 19, 1947No. 9321PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether an Army discharge under the provisions of Section 11, War Department Circular No. 39, dated February 4, 1943, providing for the discharge of enlisted men 38 years of age and over to enter essential *727industry, constituted an unconditional discharge from military service.1
The appeal is from an order of the District Court entering judgment for the ap-pellee railroad in an action brought by the appellant, a veteran, for enforcement of certain rights, under Section 8(e) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ebert v. PostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Van Doren v. Van Doren Laundry Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Grasso v. CrowhurstCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Tipper v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Landy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Bozar v. Central Pennsylvania Quarry, Stripping & Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Woods v. Glen Alden Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Kenney v. Wabash R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.