Legal Opinion
Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical Center
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 13, 1999No. AC 17709PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiffs, Frank Witt and Rebecca Witt, appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant David Lobdell after the trial court granted Lobdell’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) failed to find that the statute of limitations, General Statutes § 52-584,1 was tolled by Lobdell’s continuous duty to *701warn Frank Witt of a suspected, harmful medical condition, (2) failed to find that § 52-584 was tolled by a continuous course of conduct premised on Lobdell’s failure to correct a reported diagnosis that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Handler v. Remington Arms Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Golden v. Johnson Memorial Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Golden v. Johnson Memorial Hospital, No. Cv98-0582094-S (Sep. 17, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Vreeland v. Sowa, No. Cv96-0477087s (Apr. 29, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999