Kassel v. City of Salem
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that defendant City’s purchase of a private water company (Company) from intervenors is invalid. His complaint alleges that neither applicable statutes nor the city charter authorize the City to purchase a water company whose facilities and service area are adjacent to but outside the city limits.
ORS 225.020(l)(a) is the statutory source of authority for such municipal action. It provides:
"(1) When the power to do so is conferred by or contained in its charter or act incorporation, any city may build, own, operate and maintain waterworks, water systems,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- First National Bank v. MaladyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Salem v. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Yamhill Electric Co. v. City of McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Lindsey v. Dairyland InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- RealVest Corp. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Kuhn v. HeerwagenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. MarcaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989