Yamhill Electric Co. v. City of McMinnville
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, J.
In the judgment of the writer this is a case the decision of which involves very far-reaching and important consequences far beyond the mere financial results which may flow from a decree for or against either of the immediate parties. For this reason, and in order that every available source of information and precedent might be thoroughly examined, its decision has been considerably delayed.
The contention of the plaintiff may be briefly stated as follows: First, the defendant, as a municipal corporation, possesses, within its municipal limits, plenary power to supply its citizens and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Brown v. GeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Low v. Rees Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Churchill v. Grants PassOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Pearce v. RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Carroll v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- City of Salem v. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Bell v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. City of McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.