RealVest Corp. v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal and defendants, Lane County and its lessees, cross-appeal from the trial court’s judgment in this declaratory judgment proceeding. ORS 28.010-28.160. The trial court rendered a judgment for defendants, declaring that a deed restriction is not enforceable against the county’s property. Also, the trial court held that plaintiffs’ use of a driveway across the county’s property was subject to an implied dedication for public use, and it therefore refused to enjoin plaintiffs’ existing use. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3) (2001). We affirm on both appeal and cross-appeal.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Ludgate v. SomervilleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Tipperman v. TsiatsosOregon Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Dayton v. JordanCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- Landis v. LimbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- City of Mosier v. Hood River Sand, Gravel & Ready-Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Cassidy v. PAVLONNISCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.