Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. Heerwagen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1979No. 31765, CA 13010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Plaintiffs sued for a declaratory judgment to nullify asserted easements on real property that plaintiffs had purchased in 1975; they also sought an injunction prohibiting use of the asserted easements by defendants. The trial court declared the easements valid and ordered defendants to conduct a survey to establish their exact boundaries. On appeal, plaintiffs assign five errors, which we discuss in two groups: (1) In assignments one, four and five, plaintiffs argue that the theory of implied easement was not pleaded by defendants, that the trial court’s final order failed to specify whether…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cheney v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Anderson v. GuentherOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lindsey v. Dairyland InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kassel v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Neuschafer v. McHaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Marquess v. GeuyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API