Legal Opinion

Fox v. Spring Lake Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1891PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Diekerman, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

The defendant was operating a blast-furnace at Bangor, Mich., in March, 1888, and employed plaintiff as top filler, whose duty it was to put coal and ore into the top of the furnace, and keep it full. There was a platform at the top of the furnace, to which the coal and ore were brought by means of a car running up an inclined plane from the stock-house, and operated by an engine in the engine-house connected with the car by a wire rope which wound around an iron drum. There was a brake attached to the drum for the purpose of stopping and holding the car at any point on the track. The whole…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Schroeder v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kaukola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API