Legal Opinion

Kaukola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1910No. Docket No. 92PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Gogebic; Cooper, J. Case by Eino Kaukola against the Oliver Iron Mining Company for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action on the case brought and tried in the Gogebic circuit to recover damages for a personal injury received by the plaintiff about 10 o’clock on the night of April 4, 1907, while employed by the defendant in the Aurora iron mine at Ironwood, which was operated by the defendant. There was a jury trial, and at the close of all the evidence, upon the defendant’s motion, the circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant, and a judgment followed accordingly. The case is brought here by the plaintiff upon writ of error.

We have discovered in the record no reversible error in the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Morton v. Detroit, Bay City & Alpena RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Judis v. Borg-Warner CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Villar v. E W Bliss Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Maw v. Coast Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Otto v. Hansen Wholesale Lumber Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API