Legal Opinion

Balhoff v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1895PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Bay; Hosmer, J., presiding. Case by Margaret Balhoff, administratrix of the estate of George Balhoff, deceased, against the Michigan Central Railroad Company, to recover damages for negligently causing the death of her intestate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate, her husband, was killed upon defendant’s railroad, under the following circumstances: He was acting as a brakeman upon a freight train, a portion of which was being backed upon a siding for the purpose of making a coupling to some cars standing thereon, after having been coupled to two flat •cars loaded with logs. After making the coupling to the flat cars, the deceased sat upon one of them, between two piles of logs, and was killed by the train’s leaving the track and striking another car, which caused the logs to shift and crush him. The intestate had been engaged…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Benzing v. . Steinway and SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Quincy Mining Co. v. KittsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bradburn v. Wabash RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kaukola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lellis v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hewitt v. East Jordan Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API