Legal Opinion

Mulder v. Tague

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1971No. File 10763PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, Judge.

Peter Mulder commenced this action against defendants (1) for injunctive relief, and (2) for damages caused by surface water backing up behind alleged obstructions created or maintained by defendants. Following trial to the cburt an injunction was granted for the removal of obstructions in the natural drainage area on defendants’ properties, but the claim for damages was denied. Plaintiff appeals alleging numerous errors relating to (1) insufficiency of the findings and conclusions, (2) insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings, and (3) misapplication of the law to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Schmeling v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Wentzel v. HuebnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kougl v. CurrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. La Fleur v. KoldaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Leslie v. City of BonesteelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API