Legal Opinion

Roman v. Pearlstein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1984No. 944PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order imposing sanctions for refusal to make discovery. The sanctions were that appellant must pay appellees’ counsel a fee of $500, and that appellant is “preclud[edj ... from introducing any evidence and examining any witnesses at the trial.” We find the order reasonable as to the counsel fee but, in the circumstances, otherwise too severe. We therefore reverse so that the court may impose a more appropriate sanction.

Appellees’ complaint alleges that appellant “entered into an unlawful and fraudulent conspiracy” to induce appellees into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Resources v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Pompa v. HojnackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Hanchey v. Elliott Truck Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Novack v. NovackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Pride Contracting, Inc. v. Biehn Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Miller Oral Surgery, Inc. v. DinelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Baranowski v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Lawrence v. General Medicine Ass'n Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API