Legal Opinion

Miller Oral Surgery, Inc. v. Dinello

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1992No. 254PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action for tortious interference with plaintiff’s business relationships, the trial court entered judgment against defendants as a sanction for failure to comply with the court’s discovery orders and, after trial without jury, awarded damages to plaintiff in the amount of three hundred thousand ($300,000) dollars. Post-trial motions were denied, and the defendants appealed. They contend that the trial court (1) abused its discretion when it entered a default judgment against them and (2) erred in its computation of plaintiff’s damages.

Donald D. Dinello, D.M.D., C.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. In Re B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Spang & Co. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. In Re the June 1979 Allegheny County Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Crum v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Judge Technical Services, Inc. v. ClancySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Stewart v. RossiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. George v. SchirraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API