Legal Opinion

Baranowski v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1997No. 1551PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This is an appeal from the entry of Summary Judgment in favor of Appellees following the imposition of a discovery sanction against Appellant. 1 '

Appellees’ Motion for Sanctions alleged that Appellant failed to completely answer Supplemental Interrogatories. The trial court granted the motion and precluded Appellant from presenting any evidence against Appellee. In this appeal, Appellant argues that the discovery sanction was not warranted because the Supplemental Interrogatories were completely answered. To some questions regarding medical treatment, Appellant responded that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Liberty State Bank v. Northeastern BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Roman v. PearlsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. West v. AndersenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. FaustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Fratzola v. Klepadlo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2012
  3. Smith v. Philadelphia Gas WorksCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Dunlap v. Stevens, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1998
  5. EQT Production v. Bochter, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API