Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Neilson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1953No. 32495PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

This action was brought to set aside a public sale by Pacific county of certain real estate acquired by the county by foreclosure of delinquent taxes.

The propriety and legality of the proceedings of the county commissioners and county treasurer preceding the sale are not in issue.

The trial court found that defendant county treasurer conducted the sale in accordance with the order of the commissioners; that defendant copartnership, Latimer & Son, whom we will designate as Latimer, made a bid for the property (the amount was the minimum sale price for the land established by the county…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Anderson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Corbett v. TicktinWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. McPherson Bros. v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State Ex Rel. King County Water District v. StacyWashington Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. WohlmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Caffall Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Continental Can Co. v. Commercial Waterway District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dana v. BorenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Dana v. BorenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API