Legal Opinion

Caffall Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1971No. 41530PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

In 1968, the State Department of Natural Resources authorized a sale of timber from state-owned normal school lands. See RCW 79.01.004. The published notice of sale listed approximate quantities of Douglas fir, hemlock and cedar which were to be sold at the public auction. This notice expressly indicated that the recited timber quantities were not based on a timber cruise by the state. Although such cruises are normally conducted by the state prior to sale, none was conducted before the instant auction, apparently because of the timber industry’s request for accelerated timber sales, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gelling v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State ex rel. Makris v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Keeting v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State ex rel. Washington Paving Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rody v. HollisWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. MelcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API