Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Continental Can Co. v. Commercial Waterway District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1959No. 34933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

— This is an action instituted by the plaintiff corporation against the defendant Commercial Waterway District No. 1 and its commissioners, to compel the defendants to issue a deed and title insurance to the plaintiff for certain property which the plaintiff alleges it purchased at public auction. The facts are not in dispute.

In pursuance of Laws of 1911, chapter 11, § 8, p. 21, RCW 91.04.200; Laws of 1945, chapter 254, § 7, p. 762, RCW 36.34-.080; Laws of 1945, chapter 254, § 8, p. 762, RCW 36.34.090; and Laws of 1945, chapter 254, § 9, p. 762, RCW 36.34.100, certain real property belonging…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Coal & Coke Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Moore v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  3. Whitfield v. MayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  4. McPherson Bros. v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. WestCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Udall v. TD Escrow Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Udall v. T.D. Escrow Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Marten v. StaabNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Coleman v. DuncanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Travis v. Washington Horse Breeders Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API