Legal Opinion
Dana v. Boren
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 31, 2006No. 33684-7-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
135 P.3d 963 (2006)
133 Wash.App. 307
Troy DANA and Pamela Dana, husband and wife, Appellants.
v.
Shawn BOREN, a single man and Harold Kupers and Melinda Kupers, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 33684-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
May 31, 2006.
Jon Emmett Cushman, Attorney at Law, Joseph Scuderi, Benjamin D. Cushman, Cushman Law Offices PS, Olympia, WA, for Appellants.
Mark Colman Scheibmeir, Hillier Scheibmeir Vey & Kelly, Chehalis, WA, for Respondents.
PART PUBLISHED OPINION
QUINN-BRINTNALL, C.J.
¶ 1 Troy Dana appeals the CR 12(b)(6) dismissal of his lawsuit against Shawn Boren…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Contreras v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Ford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- San Juan Agricultural Water Users Ass'n v. KNME-TVNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Barbara Knapke v. Peopleconnect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Kim v. MoffettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Kim v. MoffettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010