Legal Opinion
Dana v. Boren
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 31, 2006No. 33684-7-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*309¶1 Troy Dana appeals the CR 12(b)(6) dismissal of his lawsuit against Shawn Boren and Harold Kupers. The superior court’s ruling was based on the conclusion that an undisclosed principal cannot enforce a contract his agent enters into. This conclusion was incorrect. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.1
Quinn-Brintnall, C.J.
FACTS
¶2 Dana and Kupers are members of The Maple Mill, L.L.C., a business entity that purchases and sells specialty wood products, including billets of cello tonewood. A cello tonewood billet consists of two large pieces of wood used to create the front and back…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Contreras v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Ford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- San Juan Agricultural Water Users Ass'n v. KNME-TVNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Kim v. MoffettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Kim v. MoffettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Dana v. BorenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006