Legal Opinion
DeLong Corporation v. Oregon State Highway Com'n
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 24, 1964No. Civ. 64-79PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Under its amended complaint, the plaintiff seeks a declaration 1 of rights in connection with the provisions of a certain contract between plaintiff and the state of Oregon, acting by and through its State Highway Commission. The contract covers the construction of. a massive bridge over the Columbia River between Astoria, Oregon, and Megler, Washington, which is being built through the joint efforts of the states of Oregon and Washington. Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss on the following premises: (1) the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Jacintoport Corp. v. Greater Baton Rouge Port CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Ronwin v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Maurice A. Krisel v. Rafael Duran, Sam Van Hining and Phillips Petroleum Company, Andeconomic Development Administration of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Adden v. MiddlebrooksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Hackin v. LockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.