Legal Opinion

White v. Umatilla County

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 3, 1965No. Civ. No. 65-221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

This is a claim by plaintiffs against defendant for damages. The claim grows out of a written contract between plaintiffs and defendant, in which plaintiffs agreed to convey to defendant a certain right-of-way for a road. The contract, among other things, required defendant to meet certain standards in order to “insure proper drainage of the adjacent land.” Plaintiffs allege a breach of the standards and claim a right of recovery on three alternate theories.

A threshold question raised by defendant is whether it should be treated as an alter ego of the state of Oregon,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Highway Comm. of Wyoming v. Utah Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Chicot County v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. DeLong Corporation v. Oregon State Highway Com'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. NA-JA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. RobertsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1966
  3. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API