Legal Opinion

Arreguin v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2008No. 33305PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION.

THE PRIOR OPINION ISSUED JANUARY 31, 2008 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.

BURDICK, Justice.

This ease arises from an unpaid claim on a homeowners insurance policy. We must decide whether an exclusionary provision in the homeowners insurance policy is ambiguous.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Miguel Arreguin obtained a homeowners insurance policy from Respondent Farmers Insurance Company of Idaho (Farmers). Subsequent to the issuance of the policy, an agent of Farmers inspected the property and decided a detached garage on the property, which would normally be covered under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Clark v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mutual of Enumclaw v. BoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Jordan v. BeeksIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Boise v. Planet InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mortensen v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Armstrong v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Thomas v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API