Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Beeks

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2001No. 25592PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the district court awarding summary judgment to attorney Paul Beeks and the law firm of Smith, Beeks & Hodges, P.L.L.C., in the legal malpractice action brought by Chris and Betsy Jordan. We affirm the district court’s decision.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Facts

Chris and Betsy Jordan, husband and wife, hired attorney Beeks for advice regarding the enforceability of an oral agreement entered into with Carl and Margaret Anderson, husband and wife, and Greg Anderson, Carl’s son. Chris Jordan is the son of Margaret Anderson. The Jordans…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yoakum v. Hartford Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McKay v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Johnson v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Carnell Ex Rel. Estate of Carnell v. Barker Management, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Harrigfeld v. HancockIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Waller v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFAREIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Estate of Becker v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API