Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2009No. 34250PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATURE OF CASE

W. JONES, Justice.

This case involves the question of whether a “household appliance” provision in a homeowner’s insurance policy (the Policy) provides coverage for damage to a dwelling and personal property caused by the collapse of an outdoor above-ground swimming pool. The district court denied Brian and Glenda Armstrong’s (Appellants) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and found that the swimming pool was unambiguously not within the meaning of the “household appliance” provision of the Policy; thus, the court held the Policy did not provide any coverage for Appellants’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clark v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Robinson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mutual of Enumclaw v. BoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kootenai Environmental Alliance, Inc. v. Panhandle Yacht Club, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Miller v. World Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Valiant Idaho v. VP IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Halvorson v. North Latah County Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API