Armstrong v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NATURE OF CASE
W. JONES, Justice.
This case involves the question of whether a “household appliance” provision in a homeowner’s insurance policy (the Policy) provides coverage for damage to a dwelling and personal property caused by the collapse of an outdoor above-ground swimming pool. The district court denied Brian and Glenda Armstrong’s (Appellants) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and found that the swimming pool was unambiguously not within the meaning of the “household appliance” provision of the Policy; thus, the court held the Policy did not provide any coverage for Appellants’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Clark v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Robinson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Mutual of Enumclaw v. BoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Kootenai Environmental Alliance, Inc. v. Panhandle Yacht Club, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Miller v. World Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Valiant Idaho v. VP IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Halvorson v. North Latah County Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.