Legal Opinion
Probert v. Family Centered Services of Alaska, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 23, 2011No. 09-35703PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Family Centered Services of Alaska (“FCSA”) and its officers filed this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s conclusion that FCSA’s Therapeutic Family Homes (“Homes”) are covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and are subject to its overtime provisions. We conclude that the Plomes are not covered by that statute because they are not an “institution primarily en gaged in the care of the sick, the aged, mentally ill or defective who reside on the premises of such institution.” 29 U.S.C. § 203(r)(2)(A). As a result, we reverse…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ileto v. Glock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Dent v. Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
3Cited by29 opinions
- Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- James v. City of Costa MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.