Legal Opinion
James v. City of Costa Mesa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 21, 2012No. 10-55769PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FISHER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BERZON.
ORDER
Judge Pregerson and Judge Fisher have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge Berzon has *396voted to grant the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
Appellants’ petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed June 4, 2012, is DENIED.
The amended opinion and amended partial concurrence/partial dissent filed May…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. Adrian HazardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- O'Donnell v. Tristar Esperanza Properties, LLC (In Re Tristar Esperanza Properties, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.