Legal Opinion
United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 30, 2016No. Case No. CV 11-5097 FMO (SSx)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER Re: PENDING MOTION
Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge
Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (Dkt. 92), the court concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001), and concludes as follows.
*1253BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a series of oil spills that occurred between 2005 and 2010. On June 17, 2011, plaintiffs United States of America (the “Government”), and the…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- GemCap Lending, LLC v. Quarles & Brady, LLPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. v. McClendonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Aecom Energy & Constr., Inc. v. RipleyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Caiz v. RobertsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Vogel v. Winchell's Donut Houses Operating Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.