Legal Opinion
Rabinowitz v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
This is one of two motions by defendants to dismiss the complaint. The defendant, Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, appearing specially, moves to dismiss upon the ground that, being a national banking association established and located in the county and city of San Francisco, California, it cannot under express provision of Federal statute (U. S. Rev. Stat., § 5198; U. S. Code, tit. 12, § 94) be sued elsewhere without its consent.
In opposition it is urged that the section relied upon was repealed years ago, although retained in error in the codification of the Federal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Leonardi v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Van Reed v. People's National Bank of LebanonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Rabinowitz v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Monarch Wine Co. v. ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Chaffer v. Glens Falls National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.