Legal Opinion
Monarch Wine Co. v. Butte
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1952No. Civ. 15234PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant Citizens National Trust and Savings Bank of Los Angeles * appeals from an order denying its motion for change of venue from the San Francisco Superior Court to that of Los Angeles County.
Question Presented
Does title 12, U.S.C.A., section 94, give a national bank, regardless of the California venue laws, the right to have an action against it tried in the county of its residence?
Record
Plaintiffs sued defendant and others in the San Francisco Superior Court on combined causes of action to recover proceeds of certain fire insurance policies. Defendant is a national banking association…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Central Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Langdeau v. Republic National Bank of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Ebeling v. Continental Illinois Natl. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.