Legal Opinion
Chaffer v. Glens Falls National Bank & Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The defendant bank moves to change the place of trial from New York County to Warren County on the ground that as a national banking association, having no office or place of business in New York County, it is immune from suit there by virtue of the provisions of section 94 of title 12 of the United . States Code, providing as follows: “ § 94. Venue of suits. *182Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the United States held within the district in which such association may be established, or in any State, county, or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Leonardi v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Waldo v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Decker v. CanzoneriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Lapinsohn v. Lewis Charles, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Sulil Realty Corp. v. Rye Motors, Inc., New York County Courts1965
- Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.