Rabinowitz v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
This is one of two separate motions made by two of the three named defendants appearing specially to vacate the service of the summons. The defendant Kaiser-Frazer Corporation moves for' an order to vacate the service of a summons herein on the ground that it was not served upon a proper person in accordance with section 229 of the Civil Practice Act. A third motion is made by the plaintiff for an examination pursuant to section 307 of the Civil Practice Act in the event that additional proof is needed with respect to the opposition to the motion to dismiss made by the defendant Kaiser-Frazer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Industrial Research Corp. v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Taca International Airlines, S. A. v. Rolls-Royce of England, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- ESI, Inc. v. Coastal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Saraceno v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.