Thorne, Neale & Co. v. Coe
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
El CHER, Chief Justice.
In the hearing on the motion to dismiss, there were two questions raised: (1) Has the court jurisdiction over defendant Carney by reason of an alleged general appearance; and (2) Is the Commissioner an adverse party within the meaning of section 72a of Title 35, U.S. C.A.?
Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides that “No defense or objection' is waived by being joined with one or more other defenses or objections in a responsive pleading or motion.” (emphasis supplied).
The question of general and special…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Baldwin Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Coe v. Hobart Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Tomlinson of High Point v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Alexandrine v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Eno v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phillips MacHinery Co. v. LeBlond, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1980
- Munson Line, Inc. v. GreenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Bowles v. Sunshine Packing Corp. of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Alford v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1944