Legal Opinion
Alford v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 14, 1944No. Civ. No. 3182PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
This is a motion to quash the summons and dismiss the complaint upon the grounds, (a) that the venue in this action for alleged patent infringement is improper and does not comply with the requirements of the provisions of section 48 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 109, and (b) that the complaint should be dismissed for the further reason that this court is without statutory jurisdiction in this action under the venue clause of the complaint.
The plaintiff contends that the general appearance on the part of the defendant has waived his right to a favorable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Carter v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Endrezze v. Dorr Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Devine v. GriffenhagenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weatherhead Co. v. ColettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980