Legal Opinion

Alexandrine v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 14, 1934No. Patent Appeal No. 6107PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District dismissing appellant’s bill to enjoin the Commissioner of Patents from canceling appellant’s trade-mark No. 206729, for gloves, registered December 8, 1925, and consisting of a fanciful design with the word “Alexandrine” across it.

in August, 1928, Marshall Field & Co., an Illinois corporation, applied for the registration, under the 10-year clause of section 5 (b) of the Trade Mark Act of 1905 (33 Stat. 724, 725), as amended (section 85 (b), tit. 15, U. S. C., 15 USCA § 85 (b), of the name “Alexandre” for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gandy v. MarbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. United States Ex Rel. Baldwin Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Lucke v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Continental Distilling Corporation v. Old Charter Distillery Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Hygienic Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. Eno v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  4. Barron-Gray Packing Co. v. Kings-LandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  5. Old Charter Distillery Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API