Legal Opinion
Learnard v. Inhabitants of Town of Van Buren
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 24, 2001No. 1:01-mj-00034PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket #5). Defendants state that they make the Motion pursuant to Rule 12. Based on the language of the Motion, it is clear that it was crafted to oppose Counts I and II of the Complaint on the ground that they fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), and that it challenges Counts III, IV, V, VI and VII for both failing to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. MoreauDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
- Joubert-Vazquez v. Alvarez-RubioDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- Ramirez v. ArlequínDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- BOUCHER v. LEWISTON SCHOOL COMMITTEEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- HEWES v. PUSHARDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.