Hair v. Hair
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Petitioner sued respondent for divorce and asked that a written property settlement between the parties be enforced by the court. Respondent counterclaimed for a divorce, asked that the agreement be annulled and that a conveyance by him of his interest in the family home pursuant to this agreement be set aside. The chancellor denied both parties a divorce, set aside the agreement, and ordered respondent’s quitclaim deed to be set aside. This decree was upheld by the Court of Appeals. Hair v. Hair, 270 Ark. 948, 607 S.W. 2d 72 (Ark. App. 1980). We granted certiorari. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNew v. McNewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Carter v. YoungerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- O'Quin v. O'QuinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Forsgren v. ForsgrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Russell v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.