Legal Opinion

Forsgren v. Forsgren

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1982No. CA81-292PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

Appellant argues that the evidence presented in this case was insufficient to justify the granting of divorce to appellee. We disagree. Appellee sought a divorce on the grounds of general indignities under the provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1202 (Supp. 1981). There was sufficient testimony to indicate that appellant, during the three years of her marriage, was guilty of excessive consumption of alcohol and drugs ¡and that this activity resulted in massive medical bills and marital problems between the parties. These allegations were corroborated by one disinterested…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andres v. AndresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Hair v. HairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Carmical v. CarmicalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Papuchis v. PapuchisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  2. White v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. McCormick v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Forsgren v. ForsgrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  5. White v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API