Legal Opinion
City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 14, 1994No. 93-1251Published
1Opinion of the Court
888 S.W.2d 290 (1994)
318 Ark. 616
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK and Arkansas Public Service Commission, Petitioners,
v.
AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC., Respondent.
No. 93-1251.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
November 14, 1994.
Wright, Lindsey and Jennings, Little Rock, for petitioners.
Gilbert L. Glover, Paul J. Ward, R.B. Friedlander, Little Rock, for respondent.
GLAZE, Justice.
This case was originally decided by the Arkansas Public Service Commission which upheld the validity of a Little Rock ordinance that required AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. to pay certain fees for the privilege…
Also in this document: Dissent · Dudley; Dissent · Corbin.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mears v. Arkansas State HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Sugarloaf Mining Co. v. Arkansas Department of Pollution Control & EcologySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.