Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 22, 1986No. CA 85-349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawson Cloninger, Judge.

This is a divorce case in which the appellee was granted a divorce from the appellant. Appellant alleges four points for reversal: insufficient proof of grounds for divorce; inadequate corroboration of those grounds; error in awarding judgment for temporary alimony; and that the award of alimony was improper or, in any event, excessive. The question we will resolve on this appeal is whether the appellee’s grounds for divorce were sufficiently corroborated. We agree with appellant’s contention that appellee’s grounds were inadequately corroborated and reverse on that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andres v. AndresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Copeland v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Sowards v. SowardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rachel v. RachelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Coker v. CokerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API