Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Stiner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1916No. 20,032PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Decatur district court; William S. Langmade, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Theodore Schultz, the holder of a note secured by a real-estate mortgage, sued its makers, Alfred Stiner and his wife, asking judgment also against the payee, Howard L. Vale, as endorsee. Judgment was rendered foreclosing the mortgage and confirming an attachment levied upon land belonging to Vale. Thereafter a receiver of the mortgaged property was appointed. After the expiration of the term of court at which judgment was rendered against him, Vale, who was served only by publication, and who had previously made no appearance, moved to set…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cohen v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Sharp v. McColmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Beverly v. BarnitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. Barnett v. Holyoke Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Vail v. School District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Schubach v. HammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Noble v. LangmadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Capitol Building & Loan Ass'n v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Equitable Life Insurance v. RoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API