Continental Oil Company, Cross-Appellee v. Jimmy R. Cole, D/B/A Jim R. Cole & Associates and Cole Development Co. Inc., Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POLITZ, Circuit Judge:
Continental Oil Company (Conoco) appeals the determination by the trial court that its patent for a seismic cable depth-controlling paravane is not infringed by a device patented by Jimmy R. Cole. Cole cross-appeals, challenging the validity of Conoco’s patent. We disagree with the trial judge and conclude that Cole’s device infringes, being equivalent in function and operation to Conoco’s paravane. We also conclude that Conoco’s patent is valid. We therefore reverse the decision of the trial judge, render judgment in favor of Conoco and remand for further proceedings.
The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- North Mississippi Communications, Inc. v. Douglas W. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Travis Paul v. Petroleum Equipment Tools Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- A. B. Baumstimler v. Bueford B. Rankin, Kenneth J. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.