Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Osborne
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiff appeals from judgment, without a jury, in favor of defendants Walter L. Osborne and Doris H. Osborne, in an action for reimbursement against indemnitors on materialmen’s and performance bonds.
Questions Presented
I. Was defendant Doris H. Osborne liable as an indemnitor?
II. Did plaintiff breach its duty to mitigate damages and not to increase indemnitors’ obligations?
Record
Plaintiff brought this action against Walter L. Osborne, Doris H. Osborne, John S. Bowie and Virginia Lee Bowie, individually, but not against the Osborne-Bowie partnership. The relief sought was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Livingston S. Hiern v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PutfarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- First Congregational Church of Christ v. LowreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Tally v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- United States Fire Insurance v. JohansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Grove v. Grove Valve & Regulator Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. LundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.