Legal Opinion

Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. Iwasaki

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1968No. L. A. No. 29576PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Plaintiff brought this action on a “Continuing Guaranty” agreement which provided that defendant guaranteed all present and future indebtedness of Mikio *84and Yo Nagayama to the extent of $5,000 principal plus interest. Plaintiff sought recovery of the amounts owed by the Nagayamas on three loans, one of which plaintiff made several months after defendant executed the continuing guaranty. The trial court entered judgment for plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,253.13, plus $215.45 interest and $235.00 attorney’s fees. Plaintiff appeals, alleging that the trial court erred in holding that…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. NahabedianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v. NotteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. United States v. Imperial Food Imports, and American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Economic Dev. v. Pavonia ResturantNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API