Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Putfark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 26, 1934No. 32723PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

R. P. Farnsworth & Co., Inc., was the general contractor for the construction of the criminal courthouse and jail building in the city of New Orleans, and entered into a subcontract with the copartnership of Samuel Bird and Frederick Putfark to cover all plastering and lathing, etc., in the sum of $71,000.

The subcontractors applied to plaintiff surety company for a bond in this sum in favor of the general contractor and all materialmen, laborers, and claimants, and attached to the application an indemnity agreement signed individually by Bird and Putfark, whereby each of them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Bradford-Kennedy Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Livingston S. Hiern v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Gulf, Mobile & N. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Duracell International Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. LundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Hammons v. ABB CE SERVICES, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API