Charleston, S.C. Registry for Golf & Tourism, Inc. v. Young Clement Rivers & Tisdale, LLP
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, J.:
Charleston, S.C. Registry for Golf and Tourism, Inc., a/k/a Charleston Registry for Golf and Tourism (“Charleston Registry”) along with Calvin Stone and Martin James Barrier (“Appellants”) brought this suit against the law firm of Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, LLP (“Young Clement”) alleging causes of action for negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent supervision related to the firm’s affiliation with attorney Douglas A. Barker. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Young Clement on all of the claims. We affirm.
FACTS
The claims raised in this case…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Rayfield Ex Rel. Estate of Rayfield v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Rickborn v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cowburn v. LeventisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Hoskins v. KingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
- Holcombe v. Helena Chemical Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Murphy v. Jefferson Pilot Communications Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Ritter & Associates, Inc. v. Buchanan Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.