Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. King

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 17, 2009No. C/A No.: 3:08-2442-JFAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the following motions:

1) Siemens’ motion for summary judgment [dkt. # 80],

2) Siemens’ motion for protective order [dkt. # 83],

3) Hoskins’ motion to compel [dkt. #87],

4) Wheels Inc.’s motion for final judgment [dkt. # 121],

5) King and Siemens’ joint motion for partial summary judgment as to punitive damages [dkt. # 123], and

6) King and Siemens’ joint motion for partial summary judgment as to Cheryl Hoskins’ survival claim [dkt. # 122],

The parties have fully briefed each motion and the court heard oral argument…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Foradori v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Doe v. MarionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rutland v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Holcombe v. Helena Chemical Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  3. Rutland v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Fuller v. Finley Resources, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  5. Rockwell v. Knott, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API