Legal Opinion

Cowburn v. Leventis

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 16, 2005No. 3990PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

James Cowburn brought several causes of action against Andrew Leventis and Fidelity National Bank related to his investment in a Ponzi scheme. 1 Both Leventis and Fidelity made motions for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

James Cowburn contributed financially to a series of investments collectively known as the “Cash 4 Titles Program” (the Program). The Program, as it was described to Cowburn, engaged in the business of issuing short-term, high interest rate notes and bonds for the purpose of funding the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Hendricks v. Clemson UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Moore v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Jackson v. Bermuda Sands, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Johnson v. John Hancock FundsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. McLaughlin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API