Legal Opinion

United States v. Steven Darrell Diamond

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1995No. 94-30279PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether a local law enforcement officer who is cross-deputized as a special United States marshal and acting at the direction of a federal agent loses the protection of 18 U.S.C. § 111 because he was assaulted while intervening in a state law crime. We hold that such an officer is protected by 18 U.S.C. § 111.

Steven Darrell Diamond appeals his sentence and conviction for assaulting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111. He contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction and that the government failed to prove the charged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Leo BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Lucio MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. William WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Robert Allen MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Steven George NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Rolland Terry Coleman,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. State v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API