Legal Opinion

United States v. William Weiland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2005No. 04-30091PublishedCited by 357 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant William Weiland appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of possessing two firearms and ammunition as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and one count of forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). Weiland argues: 1) that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(b) requires suppression of the firearms and ammunition seized during a search of his home because the warrant that authorized the search was not requested by a “federal law enforcement officer” or an “attorney for the government;” 2) that…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by357 opinions

  1. Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. GrajedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Yeley-DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

352 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API