Legal Opinion

United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 23, 1967No. 226, Docket 30587PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, Martin, Heliczer and Smith were found guilty by a jury on a single count indictment for violating Title 18 U.S.C. § 111 1 by assaulting, resisting and interfering with the arrest of Martin by Federal Narcotics Agents Jensen, Feldman, Maher and O’Neill. A co-defendant Nolan was acquitted. Judgments were entered against the three who were convicted; sentences of three months were imposed upon Martin and Smith and the imposition of sentence upon Heliczer was suspended and he was placed on probation for two years. It is from these judgments that they appeal.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Bad Elk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. The United States of America v. Louis C. Viale, Marino J. Faliero, Sr., Joseph S. Pinnavia, Louis a.abbonando, Anthony F. Fino and Nicholas S. LongoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Atlas v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. State v. KoonceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. City of Columbus v. FraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Miller v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API