Legal Opinion

State v. Hubbard

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 8, 2001No. 19283-1-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, A.C.J.

A plea must be voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered. An Alford} plea is by definition equivocal. It is nonetheless acceptable if factually supported. In re Personal Restraint of Montoya, 109 Wn.2d 270, 280-82, 744 P.2d 340 (1987). Here, Josh J. Hubbard attempted to enter a plea to first degree theft other than with a firearm, a crime charged in the information along with second degree robbery. The court refused Mr. Hubbard’s Alford plea because of the serious nature of the charge and Mr. Hubbard’s refusal to accept responsibility for his crime. The question before…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. BowermanWashington Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. In Re Personal Restraint Petition of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Thomas L. Sluman v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API